4.6
654
Published on 1/13/2023 - Last modified on 1/13/2023
The GMT Master II is a model that I have always liked. The day I decided to buy one, it was obvious to me that of all the variants, the 16713 (gold/steel) was the natural choice. First, I have trouble with 6-digit GMTs with their shiny ceramic bezel and the typography of the bezel that is too "square". The 5-digit GMTs are more "small" and "softer", and also more vintage. Then, by putting a 16710 LN and a 16713 side by side, there was no hesitation for me. Where the 16710 appeared almost dull, the 16713 radiated, sang,... It is not for nothing that they say that gold is a warm metal. I have always liked gold watches which give that little chic touch that steel watches sometimes have difficulty having. And then if you like vintage like me, gold watches (and especially gold-plated) are legion. Even chronographs from the 50s/60s are often gold-colored. So to summarize, a gold/steel GMT Master II was an obvious choice. Especially since this one is in superb condition. It is a first hand from 2000, bought from an exclusive vintage Rolex professional with all the history. I bought it and I do not regret having ignored all the comments of the time made by people who did not own this model, had probably never seen one in real life, but who still denigrated it with prejudices of a bling-bling watch reserved for the Middle Eastern and American markets. Afterwards, it did me a lot of good, because at the time (about 5 years ago), the gold/steel version cost much less second-hand than the all-steel version!!! I did not know that steel cost more than gold...thanks fashion! Since then, several brands have released gold/steel models, models have been seen in stores and the comments have evolved positively, unfortunately leading to an increase in the price. But here and there, we still hear some prejudices that die hard. To conclude, this Rolex 16713 is the elegant GMT Master II of the range, halfway between the steel version "sporty tool watch" and the gold version "precious" ... and very expensive. It can even be used as a "dress watch" because its diameter of 40 mm is fairly standard for any wrist, and it is not very thick for a so-called professional watch. So, if gold and steel tempts you, don't hesitate: treat yourself and put down the prejudices!
anonymous own this watch for 3 to 10 years
4.6
4.5
Emotion
5.0
Design
5.0
Accuracy
4.5
Comfort
5.0
Robustness
3.5
Value for money
Secondary
Significance in a collection
Main
Rarely
Frequency to be worn
Often
Pleasure
Main motivation for buying
Investment
This review is the subjective opinion of a Dialicious community member and not of Achille SAS or its teams
Rolex
GMT-Master II
5.0
Rolex GMT MASTER II ref 16710 -
published by Bazo_watches
Rolex
GMT-Master II
5.0
an airport on my wrist
published by Wrist Journal
Rolex
GMT-Master II
5.0
GMT-Master II Black Bezel
published by anhorologyaficionado
Rolex
GMT-Master II
5.0
The wisest of the GMT MASTER II
published by MOREL
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.8
The statutory
published by SC
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.8
Timeless
published by Jonathan Utcwatches
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.8
Timeless, versatile and sturdy!
published by mathwatch
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.8
La BRUCE WAYNE
published by Valentinbzh
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.8
Gorgeous
published by Tblt
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.7
Sporty and dressy
published by bootsndenim
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.7
The best of both worlds
published by Frenchronometer
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.7
"ROOTBEER "
published by Jonathan
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.5
A horological phoenix in a furious world
published by ChuckMaddox
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.5
A warm watch
published by Gilou
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.4
the varied ALL ROAD watch from Rolex
published by buonomo
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.3
Precious GMT
published by IZU69
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.2
GMT-II Z series
published by LeMi
Rolex
GMT-Master II
4.0
The GMT Mater II Pepsi 16710
published by SimGmt
You own a Rolex GMT-Master II ?
Take the opportunity to share why and how you love it