5.0
369
Published on 11/27/2023 - Last modified on 11/27/2023
It's not easy to find a nice Pepsi, despite the plethora of models offered in all brands, I had tried the Tudor, too big, And to think that I had never noticed this model (admittedly, it doesn't do GMT) a tad smaller than a Sub, flatter, super comfortable... and a quality of steel???!!!! Incredible??! I tried a GMT 1675 from 78 a month ago, to see... and to check if it was love at first sight despite "its low price" of €18,500... it was correct, but not crazy in terms of patina... This one, with its slightly blue slate dial, and the quality of manufacture?!!! Just incredible, especially for the price.... 120 balls?!? the patina, the fresh butter indexes!?!? It is over 30 years old… it is a model followed from 83 to 93 more or less.. after it evolved less well… the current model is in 43?!!? And visually disgusting… I am Happy as the day I bought my first Rolex!!!! And that, it is priceless… only unknown, the kinetic movement.. which some complain about… the previous owner in over 30 years… zero hassle.. I tend to trust Seiko… it is a bit like a Land Cruiser… indestructible
73 own this watch for less than 1 year
5
5.0
Emotion
5.0
Design
5.0
Accuracy
5.0
Comfort
5.0
Robustness
5.0
Value for money
Secondary
Significance in a collection
Main
Rarely
Frequency to be worn
Often
Pleasure
Main motivation for buying
Investment
This review is the subjective opinion of a Dialicious community member and not of Achille SAS or its teams
Rolex
Submariner
14060
5.0
“Like everyone else, I wanted my Submariner….”
published by 73
Herbelin
Antichoc
4.4
The OSS 117 watch!!!!
published by 73
Yema
Rallygraf
4.8
Cravings for 6263 Big Red à la Bebel…thwarted….
published by 73
Rolex
Datejust 34
5.0
I wanted it so much…..
published by 73
Seiko
Prospex Solar Diver
4.8
The most beautiful alternative to a Panda 6263
published by 73
You own a Seiko Kinetic Sports 150 ?
Take the opportunity to share why and how you love it